daatrue.blogg.se

I was pleased to find this exact repetition of, for instance, p. 98), or 'repeating or clarifying or supplementing' the original claim, with the clarification or supplementation being versions of the subjunctive conditional just quoted. In fact, (2), and (3) are naturally read as 'emphasizing' (p. This, in turn, is a moral remark, not one from an essentially distinct philosophical or second-order theory. (3), for example, is equivalent 'in ordinary discourse' to the claim that genocide in Bosnia would have been wrong whatever people thought about it (p. They none of them stake out a second order, or metaethical position. His central claim is that each of these three can have only an 'internal' reading, according to which they make moral remarks and are to be assessed as such. These three illustrate something Dworkin thinks we all believe: the ' face value view' of morality. These opinions are true, and we know them to be true.Genocide in Bosnia is wrong, immoral, wicked, odious.Workin's paper is long, but the central claim can be put surprisingly briefly. Simon Blackburn, University of North Carolina